Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
62-unit Grandview Avenue housing development→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 21, 2026.
Public comments (4)
The 555 Grandview resident said traffic will be a disaster with the new daycare nearby, questioned how building in wetlands will affect her already-wet property, and asked for better landscaping than the 'stark' recent subdivisions.
Planning Board (Regular) - Jul 21, 2026 · 1:12:00 →The 124 Lancaster Avenue resident said neighbors got input too late, praised the single-family designs, but objected to multifamily buildings too close to Grandview and asked about the fate of Lot 16 and saving the old nursery trees.
Planning Board (Regular) - Jul 21, 2026 · 1:16:22 →A homeowner who walks Grandview daily, she blamed nearby development for flooding, roof-damaging wind, lost open space and displaced animals, and demanded taxpayers get to vote on uses of city-owned land.
Planning Board (Regular) - Jul 21, 2026 · 1:20:34 →The DeWitt Avenue resident, whose back line abuts the power corridor, said houses packed so close together create a poor quality of life and urged caution about congestion.
Planning Board (Regular) - Jul 21, 2026 · 1:26:50 →